Make your organization intelligent
As a leading consultant in Business Intelligence, we offer a small but high-quality range of Business Intelligence services. Our Business Intelligence guide focuses on what you want to achieve in the near future, what the business benefits are, and how to get there, in 5 steps.
In this article 🕑 11 minutes
- Where are you now?
- Where do you want go?
- How do you get there?
- Business Intelligence strategy and governance
- The Business Intelligence roadmap
- Stage 0: Incomprehension
- Stage 1: Local understanding
- Stage 2: Coordinated organizing
- Stage 3: Integral improvement
- Stage 4: Intelligent innovation
- Business Intelligence governance: the compass
- What can we offer you?
- Interested in our BI-strategy services?
Where are you now?
The current Business Intelligence situation will be addressed, discussed, analyzed, and compared with the best practices and newest available technologies. We will help you to quickly find out where improvements can be made.
Where do you want go?
Based on the previous step and the expected business benefits, it’s smart to create a Business Intelligence plan, leading to a clear goal. What competitive advantage can be achieved by upgrading your current Business Intelligence system? What are the benefits for the business users and the IT professionals? How to present the plan to your stakeholders and directors?
How do you get there?
Now that you know where you want to go, it’s time to formulate a Business Intelligence strategy for the future. This can be implemented by setting standards, the implementation of a Business Intelligence competency center, using Business Intelligence in the cloud, implementing a Business Intelligence framework, using one platform for Business Intelligence, or a combination of all of these options. Below you’ll find three in-depth topics so you can get more familiar with the key aspects of a good Business Intelligence strategy.
1. Business Intelligence strategy and governance
We can initiate and implement all sorts of projects in the field of Business Intelligence; we can have a magnificent system with an intelligent architecture; we can apply data mining ingeniously, but if we do not apply a lasting Business Intelligence strategy and governance, all of these efforts are useless, because they will not produce lasting results (or returns). What may happen, for example, is that the applications we have developed will not be used in the long term, simply because the relevance of the information is not being monitored periodically or because our attention to keeping our Business Intelligence systems up to date lessens. Of course, BI projects are important, but Business Intelligence is more than performing successful projects. It also involves selecting the right Business Intelligence tools and devising well thought-out architectures.
We must realize that the Intelligent organization does not just happen; it may take years before we reach the highest possible level and this requires on-going commitment from management, as well as a lot of attention to elementary practical and strategic aspects of Business Intelligence. In order to achieve the Intelligent organization we must not only draft a good Business Intelligence strategy and establish good BI governance, we must also – and more importantly – maintain both. Business Intelligence must become a habit, and alignment between registering processes, processing and responding, internal and external information, and business and technology must be central to this. In this chapter, we outline the course that organizations can pursue towards maximal intelligence, and we describe the main conditions and milestones. On our journey towards our ultimate destination – the Intelligent organization – we need to carry two essential tools with us:
- A BI roadmap: we need a map in order to determine the Business Intelligence strategy – the path to the ultimate goal – of the Intelligent organization. This concerns the continuous shifting of boundaries, recognizing obstacles in the landscape, and constantly increasing the level of ambition of Business Intelligence.
- A compass: this tool indicates our direction, ensures a balanced focus on the three basic processes of the Business Intelligence cycle, and forces the organization to combine internal en external information. A compass offers us guidance because it always points North – the summit of intelligence – even if we change direction. With our compass, we can always set course towards the top. This is all about Business Intelligence governance: giving direction to the intelligent organization.
An enthusiastic traveler requires both tools in order to find their way through the maze of technologies, BI tools, processes, disciplines, and visions that we encounter with Business Intelligence. The map and compass enable us to make better choices when it comes to desired projects and their priorities, which leads – among other things – to a higher return on these projects. Later we will discuss the BI competence center: the department that uses both map and compass in order to shape the Intelligent organization at a strategic level. The BI competence center also both governs and implements the necessary Business Intelligence activities and processes at an operational level.
2. The Business Intelligence roadmap
The different strategies and ambitions of the Intelligent organization can best be described by plotting the levels of ambitions against the four most essential dimensions of the concept of information: Figure 1: the BI-roadmap including the BI strategies and levels of ambition.
- content: the purpose for using the information (ambition level);
- form: the form in which the information is presented;
- time: the topicality of the information;
- location: the location – inside or outside the organization – where the information is used.
Usually, the dimensions are coordinated: when we create beautiful visualizations we don’t do this for one individual in the organization and when we don’t fully understand certain information, it’s unlikely that we will share the information with business partners.
Stage 0: Incomprehension
At this level, there is no proper understanding (incomprehension) of the situation in which the organization finds itself. The information is primarily financial and few people within the organization actually use it. The information comes straight from the source systems and is reported to stakeholders on a monthly basis in the form of basic printed reports. The information is seldom used and applied in the business operations. Instead, the ‘firm-forward’ plans of the organization are the starting point for the strategy. The organization is highly hierarchical, compartmentalized, and product-oriented and its processes are scattered (and fragmented) across many, often small, departments. The culture is bureaucratic and employees operate based on (many) regulations, rules, and procedures, which often are not standardized. If there is a database that employees can use for reporting – which is often not the case -, than it has not been set up in accordance with the business-driven approach. This database will contain a lot of data, and little information.
Stage 1: Local understanding
At this stage, the organization experiments with Business Intelligence and begins to sense the potential of Business Intelligence tools, however this is mainly limited to simple reports and interactive analysis. The organization sets up a database for each department – a data warehouse does not yet exist – and the first signals with regard to poor data quality begin to trickle in. These signals, however, are not yet picked up, simply because the organization is already quite happy with the insights they have gained. At a local level, departments gain insight into those parts of the business processes they are responsible for and develop initial, basic indicators. The information is not just financial, but also says something about the business itself and is considered increasingly important, however it is still at an operational level. Reporting now takes place both monthly and weekly and the organization gradually warms to the idea of a central data warehouse. In addition, local definitions should be aligned to each other. To arrange this, the organization sets up a BI team – still part of the IT department.
Stage 2: Coordinated organizing
At this level, the organization establishes an initial version of the data warehouse, including a balanced architecture in order to be able to obtain an integrated customer view. Data from different source systems is cleansed, connected, and integrated and subsequently presented as information with regard to both the business processes and the business operations. Where relevant, a CRM system will be purchased in which crucial information and actions about customers – such as complaints or direct mailings – can be assembled. In this way, an initial closed-loop process is created. The organization discovers both the most important key success factors (of the organization) and the most crucial relationships (in the business operations) based on which KPIs, KRIs and PIs are developed. The organization also develops various reports and analysis that map the processes and performance beyond the boundaries of individual departments. These are usually updated daily. The organization starts paying attention to the visualization of information; reports are given a uniform layout and are easier to interpret. A central Business Intelligence system is established for all employees: from top management to knowledge workers and operators. The aim is to create a single version of the truth so that the different (departmental) definitions can now be aligned. The organization comes to life and its culture becomes more informal, mainly because information exchange improves. The collaboration between departments becomes easier and the organization begins to draw up plans for an organizational structure in which the business processes are leading. However, at the same time, some resistance may emerge (in the organization) with regard to the transparency brought about by Business Intelligence. This may result in stagnation and crises, either within the Business Intelligence project or at management level. The BI team is transformed into a real BI competence center and is given more authority and status. It is extended with business analysts who take care of the regular information supply, both solicited and unsolicited analysis, and various ad hoc reports. At this stage, the competence center is governed by both IT and the management (board of directors). The organization provides its customers and stakeholders with simple reports from the data warehouse, either printed or via email. The organization considers the use of both dashboards and scorecards and cautiously experiments with the possibilities of data mining.
Stage 3: Integral improvement
At this stage, the organization decides to pivot and shift its focus from product-oriented to market-oriented. In addition, the organization intensively focuses on supply chain integration in order to improve efficiency in the business processes. The relationships between indicators and key success factors are now determined in detail. A scorecard (Balanced Scorecard, INK-model, Six Sigma) is created to then be visualized as a dashboard. The information is no longer just related to primary business processes, but also concerns secondary processes such as HRM, IT and finance. Some departments and business units that do not directly relate to the core activities of the organization are closed down or outsourced. Although this is the responsibility of general management, it is (partly) due to Business Intelligence that we have gained insights into which parts of the organization perform well and which perform poorly. We also know how these are connected. External information is collected in a regular and structured way and connected to internal information. The Business Intelligence cycle is used both as guide and as a model in order to streamline and formalize the Business Intelligence processes in the organization. The organization pays more attention to enhancing the quality of data, both in the registration process and during the processing of data. Business partners get online access to the BI system, the organizational boundaries blur and processes that involve partners are integrated. The organization purchases a portal in order to reduce the time between observation and action. Employees and business partners get access to this portal. The management of metadata is increasingly important as more systems are now interconnected and more stakeholders now use the same data and systems. If necessary, the information is updated several times a day and some (relevant) information may even be updated in real-time. The organization considers using data mining as a means of discovering correlations that are yet unknown. Forecasting and what-if analysis are further integrated to allow the calculation of the (future) effects of certain plans. The disciplines Knowledge Management, Business Intelligence, innovation management, and strategic management increasingly work together. The BI competence center is transformed into a shared service center that is fully responsible for the organization’s strategic and tactical information supply.
Stage 4: Intelligent innovation
At the highest level of ambition, the organization will use its information for innovation. More than ever, the organization both strongly and regularly focuses on those signals that indicate, for example, a decrease in demand, the impact of advertising, or product launches. Information, signalling, and actions – particularly in the fields of product marketing and innovation – follow each other rapidly and the organization will continuously innovate. Data and information are of such quality that they can be sold to third parties, not only business partners. Moreover, all the possible and relevant BI tools are applied and the organization now develops personal scorecards. Decision-making takes place at the lowest possible level and employees are (partly) rewarded based on individual, team, and organizational performance. Additionally, employees become entrepreneurs within the organization and the organization encourages self-learning abilities, whereas it discourages risk aversion. Metadata will be leading when it comes to developing and maintaining (new) information systems, allowing for rapid adjustments, and resulting in an organization that is very agile. Additionally, the organization will use ‘simulation’ in order to cope with complexity and dynamics: notable events that require ‘immediate’ action are then quickly noticed and calculated. Data is entered only once, even beyond the boundaries of the organization. The organizational structure is horizontal (flat) and the management has a large span of control. The organization is characterized by short lines of communication and is structured according to the principle of minimal coupling, maximal cohesion: it turns into a network-centric organization. At this level, the four disciplines – innovation management, Business Intelligence, knowledge management and strategic management – coincide almost entirely. The Intelligent organization is now a fact.
The different strategies (or levels of ambition) generally exhibit a causal relationship with both the environment and the type of organization. We often come across the lowest level of ambition in sluggish, bureaucratic organizations with a product-oriented structure and a formal culture, which operate in a calm and stable environment. The highest level of ambition is usually applicable to very agile and adaptive organizations with market-oriented structures and informal, though performance-driven cultures, which operate in a highly competitive environment.
We can use the BI-roadmap to measure where we stand as an organization, and subsequently to map out a long-term strategy in order to reach a higher level of ambition. Both the necessity and the will to achieve this higher level depend on several factors: the level of competition, the organizational culture, the maturity of the technology, and so forth. However, in all cases we will need a business case that justifies investing in a higher ambition level. Reaching a higher level of ambition is not to suggest that we no longer use (or stop using) elements from the lower levels. If, for example, we decide to update reports on a daily basis, we may still need to report some management information on a monthly basis. The point here is that achieving a higher level of ambition offers us the opportunity to apply various refinements, both organizationally and technically.
Reaching a higher level of ambition paves the way for organizations to start organizing and operating differently. Business Intelligence can then be seen as an ‘enabler’ for a different organizational structure, a different management style, a different way of communicating with clients, how we value our employees, and so on. Of course, Business Intelligence is not the only ‘enabler’. We may (partially) achieve the same with ‘enablers’ such as knowledge management or internet technology. So as previously stated: Business Intelligence will increasingly work in harmony with other disciplines once we reach the higher levels of ambition.
The different organizational characteristics of each level of ambition should therefore not exclusively be associated with Business Intelligence, but as possible scenarios made possible through Business Intelligence. The BI-roadmap can be seen as a well-marked route with clear ‘signposts’ that lead to permanent intelligent operations. This map is particularly useful for organizations that are yet to start with Business Intelligence or organizations that experience trouble with it.
3. Business Intelligence governance: the compass
This section discusses the basic principles of Business Intelligence governance: the Intelligent organization evenly divides its attention between the three basic processes of the Business Intelligence cycle and aims for a good balance between contextual (external) and transactional (internal) information. This is shown in the figure below.
Figure 2: BI governance ensures that all the processes and facets of Business Intelligence are addressed and get the attention they deserve.
Although from a traditional Business Intelligence point of view, the processing part (of the Business Intelligence cycle) is the most important and technically the most complex process, we must not forget that Business Intelligence (BI) also increases which signals an organization should register and how we should respond to these signals. In other words: the other processes are also important.
The point here is that we must create a closed-loop process for both the major and the minor Business Intelligence cycle. Thus, not only the three processes of the major Business Intelligence cycle – registering, processing, and responding – are attuned to one another, the minor Business Intelligence cycle is also characterized by its closed-loop nature. Based on the gathered data, the Intelligent organization will gain (new) insights with different kind of BI reporting tools, which will lead to a requirement for additional data to be collected, preferably without having to adjust the existing registration systems.
We often see that during the pioneering phase of Business Intelligence, organizations only go through the minor Business Intelligence cycle: it is only at a later stage, once a higher level of ambition has been achieved, that these organizations seriously engage with the major Business Intelligence cycle. In any case, it is crucial (in this context) that there is a function – typically, the BI competence center – within the organization that monitors the relevance of the information and, if necessary, initiates projects and implements actions, either by collecting existing data or by registering new data. Moreover, BI governance will ensure that only the data relevant to decision making are being registered – for example by taking account of this aspect when purchasing (or developing) the system. Additionally, BI governance aims to realize the best possible return on either the registered data or the access to this data, irrespective of whether it is recorded inside or outside the organization, obtainable with or without payment.
As the organization climbs the ladder of BI ambition, the phenomenon of BI Governance becomes increasingly important. If we ‘just’ wish to understand the organization (the lowest level of ambition), then we do not necessarily need to change anything or react differently. In addition, we need little or no external information. After all, we ‘only’ use Business Intelligence to gain better insight into our ‘own’ business operations. However, if we wish to innovate with Business Intelligence (the highest level of ambition), than it is extremely important that Business Intelligence serves the reactions and that innovation management, strategic management, Business Intelligence, and change management are closely intertwined. External information about our competitors or about technological developments, for example, is then important in order to be able to innovate.
Whilst defining the information needs, and often during the processing of the information, organizations may discover that they are not registering the signals – and do not have the data – they require to actually measure the performance or to get the insights they need to improve performance. If this is the case, the organization will have to go back to the first process of the major Business Intelligence cycle and try to work out what data is required. Subsequently – if possible – the organization will either adjust or extend the registration systems.
Case: Pension Fund
In 2003, a pension fund with managed assets of 53 billion started with Business Intelligence. Up until then, the fund used different systems from several external suppliers for the administration of the different types of assets – shares, bonds, futures, options and mortgages. Once the information needs were successfully mapped, the organization optimistically began to draw up a functional design that would ideally contain a description of the sources and precise definitions of the required information.
Soon the pension fund realized this was not easy: the source systems were in fact very difficult to access, and comprehend, which made it impossible to determine an exact definition of the required information. The supplier was not willing to offer assistance because they felt the data model of the source system was a trade secret. The pension fund then tried to determine the data model on the basis of trial and error, which took several months. However, in order to be able to calculate the desired information, the fund also required data they had not yet registered. They, once again, turned to the supplier to ask if this data could be added to the application.
The supplier, however, was not willing to do this. Consequently, the organization developed a separate Business Intelligence ‘data management’ application in which the additional data could be entered. However, they soon realized that this data was also important for other applications and processes (besides BI) and therefore it was decided to transform the ‘management’ application into an additional registration system. In conclusion: as a result of the above-mentioned experiences and findings, the pension fund now selects both its suppliers and applications much more carefully and all their contracts (with suppliers) now contain a clause which states that the data model must be made available if requested.
The case above demonstrates that the completeness, the quality, and the meaning of source data is crucial when it comes to measuring the performance properly. Organizations will need to go back to the registration process regularly in order to improve the registration of data, to sharpen the significance (and meaning) of data or even to develop an entirely new registration system – in case of external strategic or tactical information. However, this should not prevent organizations from starting with Business Intelligence, because most gaps are in fact revealed faster when we apply Business Intelligence.
The information and knowledge that we gain with Business Intelligence may give rise to the elimination of certain products – that are, for example, no longer profitable– from the assortment, to enter new markets or to open up additional communication channels. Naturally, such actions will affect the first process of the Business Intelligence cycle: registering signals. When we open up new communication channels or when we enter new markets, we will need to adjust the operational systems with respect to their content (adding the new product in accordance with the existing structure), or their structure (entering a new market, for example, often requires adjusting the structure of tables in operational information system and sometimes even a completely new information system). This, once again, shows that effective Business Intelligence requires a cycle consisting of three basic processes that are closely intertwined. The Intelligent organization does not just use Business Intelligence to focus on fast and accurate processing of signals into information and knowledge, but also ‘manages’ and influences the registration and response processes within the organization.
What can we offer you?
- 100% vendor-independent advice and process facilitation;
- investigation of the current situation;
- interviews with your business users & IT professionals;
- help with the BI software selection process;
- help you to present the plans and strategy to your directors;
- a second opinion.
Interested in our BI-strategy services?
Contact us and discover how we can help to develop and implement a future-proof Business Intelligence strategy.